taskfloA business owner
Someone who knows the process, the exceptions and what a good result means.
HOW WE WORK
One workflow. Reviewed together.
Bring the process your security or compliance team has said no to. We will work through what it would take to run it, and be clear about what is available today.
FROM FIRST CONVERSATION TO PRODUCTION
The path, with the status made explicit.
- Available now
Conversation
We learn the workflow, the systems it touches and what stopped it. Start by deciding whether the architecture fits, not by committing to a platform.
- Available now
Workflow mapping
Bring the business owner and the security reviewer into the same room. Map steps, decisions, people, rules and the boundary of authority.
- Founder-led design review
Bounds and architecture review
Work through illustrative bounds manually and review the specification under NDA. Automated proof panels, System Cards and evidence exports are planned product capabilities, not currently available outputs.
- Planned, not available
Pilot in your cloud
The intended next step is a scoped pilot in your AWS or Azure account, after runtime capabilities and your deployment controls have been verified. No pilot date is promised.
- Future stage
Production, then the next workflow
Production follows a successful pilot and your approvals. Reuse controls and evidence only where the next workflow has been reviewed against them.
What we need from you.
A security reviewer
The person who said no, or would. Their questions shape the workflow from the beginning.
A target environment
AWS or Azure for a future pilot. No environment access is needed for the initial conversation.
WHAT YOU CAN REVIEW TODAY
Evidence before commitment.
- Founder-led workflow mapping.
- A manually worked design-bounds review.
- The specification under mutual NDA.
- An agreed list of open questions and implementation gaps.
The architecture pack
Request → short call → mutual NDA → assembled private pack → review together.
The pack is assembled from specification material for your review. It is not an instant download or a substitute for an implemented-controls assessment.
Request an architecture review ↗HOW ENGAGEMENTS ARE SCOPED
Based on what agents do, not who logs in.
Scope depends on workflow complexity, integration and regulatory requirements. The intended model has no per-seat fees. We agree the scope with you; this is not a public price list or a production service offer.
Before the first conversation.
Do you need access to our environment?
Not for initial workflow mapping or specification review. The intended engine runs in your account without standing vendor access; verify the deployment boundary before any future pilot.
Which clouds are planned?
AWS and Azure are the architecture targets. Cloud pilots are planned, not currently available.
Who owns the workflows?
The design provides customer-controlled workflow artefacts and an intended Temporal Python export. Exported code leaves Taskflo’s governance envelope; ongoing enforcement becomes your responsibility.
What if our review still says no?
Record the specific gaps and owners. A defensible no is better than a pilot with unresolved authority or evidence.
How long does it take?
Timing depends on scope, product readiness and your review process. We do not publish a pilot or production timeline before agreeing it.
ONE WORKFLOW. A CLEAR NEXT STEP.
Which workflow would you unblock first?
Tell us about the process, the systems and the people. Let’s work through what it would take to run it.